Those leaders who capture the moment in time to contribute with their workers and support their involvement in the decision making development are consequently referred to as participative leaders, or known as independent leaders. The two expressions are actually one in the same and explain a person in charge who comprises subordinates in the conclusion making development by heartening workers to be imaginative, ground-breaking and affianced in projects. (Leadership Styles, 2015)
In turn, secondary staff are extra implicated and prepared to labor towards anything; decisions are being completed because of the vested concentration they have as a consequence of being a part of the decision building course. Workers be inclined to have a superior level of efficiency and job fulfillment since they feel appreciated by their supervisor and that’s what they declare or feel truly matters. The independent person in charge fundamentally empowers the subordinates by making out the priceless assistance they can build throughout the choice creation process. Workers turn out to be less spirited and more supportive with one another, creating a hospitable managerial culture that individuals like to be a part of. (Mason, Talya, & Berrin, 2016)
At the same time as there are a lot of benefits of participative management, it is not lacking its drawbacks. Particularly, while it can be disputed that two minds are much better than just one, it also acquires additional time to move toward a result.
Consequently, the decision making course can be enormously time-consuming at periods under the self-governing leader, but predictability leads to high-quality outcomes. The query turns out to be: is it value the hang around? There are indeed moments where pace or good organization is indispensable, building the autonomous management style unproductive.
Workers might also show antipathy towards the participative person in charge who only listens to their thoughts but in no way implements them. They desire to be capable to communicate their thoughts and perceive them place into action, if not it can guide to low enthusiasm, disbelief and thoughts of disloyalty. Still worse, the staff might not have the information, skills or capability to offer far above the ground quality contribution at some stage in decision making. The participative management method is most excellent when implemented in the group environment where efficiency and productivity obtain the back seat to excellence. (Academia, 2016)
This is the style my manager uses in our Freight Forward company where I have been working for three years in the accounting department. This style fits my expectations toward my manager and company, and that’s why I have been there for so long. Specially in my position, I need to be part of the important decisions in the company; not only part of it, I need to have a leading role too. The participative (self-governing) approach has the main purpose of building obligation and agreement among workers: The “everybody has participation” manager, encourages member of staff contribution in decision making, and stimulates by gratifying group attempt.
Academia. (2016). Leadership: The Key Concepts is an indispensable and authoritative guide to the most crucial ideas, concepts and debates surrounding the study and exercise …. Retrieved from Academia: http://www.academia.edu/658124/Leadership_The_Key_Concepts_is_an_indispensable_and_authoritative_guide_to_the_most_crucial_ideas_concepts_and_debates_surrounding_the_study_and_exercise_
Leadership Styles. (2015). Leadership Styles. Retrieved from About Health: http://psychology.about.com/od/leadership/a/leadstyles.htm
Leadership Styles. (2015). Leadership Styles. Retrieved from NwLink: http://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/leader/leadstl.html
Mason, C., Talya, B., & Berrin, E. (2016). Principles of Management. Retrieved from Catalog Flat World Knowledge: http://catalog.flatworldknowledge.com/bookhub/reader/5?e=carpenter